Legal Opinion
C.L.D. v. Wall-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 30, 1999No. CIV. 98-694 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff C.L.D. brings this action against her former employer, defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., alleging that one of her supervisors improperly disclosed private information to her co-workers. Plaintiff brings claims against defendant for tortious invasion of privacy, promissory es-toppel, and violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. § 363.03. This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment against all claims.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff began…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Vette Company and Kansas City Boneless Beef, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Pachowitz v. LeDouxCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.