Beecher v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 60. {concurring) . The decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed. The court of appeals correctly concluded that the Labor & Industry Review Commission's (LIRC's) interpretation of Wisconsin's odd-lot doctrine did not comply with Wisconsin law and therefore was erroneous.
¶ 61. I write separately to express my disagreement with the reasoning of the majority opinion on two issues:(1) The majority opinion errs in characterizing the odd-lot doctrine explained in Balczewski v. DILHR1 as a "judge-made adjunct to the law of worker's compensation,"2 as "a judge-made exception to the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.