Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Beecher v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2004No. 02-1582Published

1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.

¶ 60. {concurring) . The decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed. The court of appeals correctly concluded that the Labor & Industry Review Commission's (LIRC's) interpretation of Wisconsin's odd-lot doctrine did not comply with Wisconsin law and therefore was erroneous.

¶ 61. I write separately to express my disagreement with the reasoning of the majority opinion on two issues:(1) The majority opinion errs in characterizing the odd-lot doctrine explained in Balczewski v. DILHR1 as a "judge-made adjunct to the law of worker's compensation,"2 as "a judge-made exception to the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API