National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Gain
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
This is a many-faceted attack on those California Health and Safety Code sections which prohibit the private possession and use of marijuana by adults. It takes the form of a petition for declaratory and injunctive relief brought by the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (hereafter NORML) and 32 individual taxpayers against the Chief of Police, City Attorney, Sheriff and District Attorney of San Francisco. After the complaint had been amended once, the Attorney General intervened. He then moved for summary judgment. This appeal tests his success.
The first…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- The People v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MallanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WorthyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Herzberg v. County of PlumasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.