Legal Opinion

Mee v. Mee

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1904PublishedCited by 23 opinions

FROM BRADLEY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Bradley County. —T. M. McConnell,, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

The bill in this case seeks to set up a trust and beneficial ownership in a tract of land held by the defendant Frances T. Mee under a deed from her husband, Columbus A. Mee, which upon its face has no declaration or expression of trust. It is sought to impress this trust and set up the beneficial interest by parol proof. The habendum part of the deed, which is the only part necessary to be specially noted, is in these words:

“To have and to hold said lands herein conveyed unto the said Frances T. Mee herself and her lawful assigns forever in fee simple, and said Frances T. Mee is hereby…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Patton v. BeecherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Shelton v. . SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Brunson v. GladishTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  4. Seaton v. DyeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  5. Gibson County v. Fourth & First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API