Legal Opinion
State v. Stegman
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided March 20, 2009No. 100,375PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
Jeremiah Stegman was charged with driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. Stegman moved to suppress the blood test results, arguing that the medical assistant who withdrew the blood was not qualified to do so. The trial court determined that, as a matter of law, the medical assistant was not qualified to withdraw blood under the relevant statute. On appeal, the State contends that the trial court improperly suppressed the blood test results. We disagree. Accordingly, we affirm.
On December 16, 2006, Stegman was arrested in Lincoln County, Kansas, for driving under the influence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. StoreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. WinquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State ex rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. BohrerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MburuCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- Henke v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Matter of Marriage of WhildinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.