Legal Opinion

Bernard Koteen v. Bermuda Cablevision, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 11, 1990No. 89-7114PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

This appeal presents the issue of whether a foreign corporation and its president, who retained the services of a District of Columbia law firm, had the minimum degree of contact with the District necessary for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to exercise personal jurisdiction over them in a suit arising from that contact. We hold that they had sufficient contact with the District, and that it is a fair and reasonable forum, as required by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

I. Background

The appellants are…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by20 opinions

  1. GSS Group Ltd. v. National Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  2. Exponential Biotherapies, Inc. v. Houthoff Buruma N.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Thompson Hine, LLP v. Elicko TaiebCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. COMSAT Corp. v. Finshipyards S.A.M.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  5. Capital Bank International Ltd. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API