Legal Opinion

Orlandella v. Orlandella

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 4, 1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

Effective January 1,1974, the age of majority was changed from twenty-one to eighteen years of age. G. L. c. 4, § 7, Forty-eighth through Fifty-first, as appearing in St. 1973, c. 925 § 1. See Hamann, Eighteen: The New Age of Majority in Massachusetts, 59 Mass. L.Q. 17 (1974). The parties were divorced in 1972, and under G. L. c. 208, § 28, the husband was ordered to pay the wife $45 a week for the support of herself and their minor son. The question is reported to us whether the obligation to support the child terminates when the child becomes eighteen. See Moss & Levy, The Effect of the New…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Paul v. PaulSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  3. Speer v. QuinlanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Cohen v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Oliveria v. OliveriaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gottsegen v. GottsegenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. T.F. v. B.L.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Feakes v. BozyczkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Feinberg v. DiamantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Pagar v. PagarMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API