Legal Opinion
Jappe v. Mandt
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1955No. Civ. 20525PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This appeal arises out of an action for damages for fraud in which plaintiff alleged that he had been induced by misrepresentations of defendant to enter into a contract to purchase a rubbish route.
These alleged misrepresentations fall into two classes. The first class is affirmative in character. Generally speaking, they assert defendant represented that the business consisted of at least 1,200 customers and that the business was very profitable and the route valuable. In rendering its oral decision the court “found” these allegations were not true. Plaintiff does not, therefore, seek a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Baker v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Korry of California v. LefkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955