United Transportation Union v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCS) appeals from the district court’s grant of declaratory and injunctive relief in favor of the United Transportation Union (UTU) under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). See 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188 (1994). We vacate the district court’s order, and we remand the case.
I. Background
This ease stems from a labor dispute at a Kansas City railroad switching yard known as the “Joint Agency.” The KCS and I & M Rail Link (I & M) jointly own and operate the switching yard. KCS and I & M workers in the yard make up and break up trains, transfer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, and United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Brotherhood Of Maintenance Of Way Employees, Lodge 16 v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, District Lodge No. 19 v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Gilmore v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.