Legal Opinion
Huskey v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided September 14, 2020No. 4:19-cv-02710Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DREW HUSKEY et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) No. 4:19-cv-02710-JAR ) COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Colgate-Palmolive Company’s (hereinafter, “Colgate’”) motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, strike the nationwide class allegations. (Doc. No. 28). The matter is fully briefed and ready for disposition. For the following reasons, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. 1. Background Colgate markets Speed Stick…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.