State v. Szczerbiak
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
Following a bench trial on stipulated facts, the defendant, Mark Szczerbiak, was convicted of possession of a controlled drug, see RSA 318-B:2,1 (Supp. 2001). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained during an allegedly unconstitutional search and seizure. We affirm.
The following facts were adduced at the suppression hearing. On July 15, 2000, the Danbury Police Chief received a call informing him of a party at a residence on Forbes Mountain Road. Later that evening, young people in several vehicles stopped and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. HightSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. SantanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. SterndaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. TurmelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. BrumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. LivingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. MichelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.