Legal Opinion
Casey v. Gray
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1993No. B061720PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
The question on this appeal is whether a recorded abstract of judgment attaches to property previously conveyed by an unrecorded quitclaim deed. It does not.
Facts
In March 1979, a money judgment later assigned to Dudley Gray was entered against Scott Berglund. In September 1979, Berglund and his partner, Daniel Casey, purchased real property in San Pedro. On February 1, 1982, Berglund executed a quitclaim deed transferring his interest in the San Pedro property to Casey. On February 17, 1982, an abstract of the 1979 judgment against Berglund was recorded. On May 5,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Barisich v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Iknoian v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Wells Fargo Bank v. PAL Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Dayton v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. CharltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Daff v. Wallace (In re Cass)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Chevron U.S.A. v. IRA Administrators CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- La Marr v. La Rocco CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015