Legal Opinion
In Re Authorization to Discharge & Construct Waste-Water Treatment Facilities
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 26, 1985No. C9-84-1818PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
The State of Wisconsin appeals certain provisions of three combined sewer over flow discharge permits granted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Wisconsin claims (1) the MPCA permits do not require compliance with applicable state and federal law, (2) the permits do not require a minimum level of facilities planning necessary to comply with federal and state law, (3) the MPCA failed to correct recognized ambiguities in the permits, and (4) the permits irrationally require implementation of the facilities plan before receipt of necessary approvals.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation v. Jack J. Schramm, Regional Administrator, Region Iii, U. S. EpaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Reserve Mining Co. v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M.T. Properties, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Mechtel v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- North American Water Office v. LTV Steel Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992