Legal Opinion

Sitram GERS Equipment v. Zuleimi Benitez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 15, 2024No. 13-24-00066-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-24-00066-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG SITRAM GERS EQUIPMENT, Appellant, v. ZULEIMI BENITEZ, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides In this products liability dispute, appellant Sitram GERS Equipment (Gers) seeks relief from the trial court’s denial of its special appearance. By a single issue, Gers argues that Texas lacks personal jurisdiction over it. We reverse and render. I. BACKGROUND1 On March…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API