Moore v. Energy States, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
W.G. ARNOT, III, Chief Justice.
Ouida Moore and the other appellants/plaintiffs 1 brought suit to obtain possession of and title to real property and also to recover damages related to the drainage of oil from that property. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the following grounds: (1) the plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest had no title to the disputed property and (2) alternatively, any title held by the plaintiffs’ predecessors was transferred to the defendants’ predecessor in interest as a matter of law under the appurtenances doctrine, the strip-and-gore doctrine, or the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Seber v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- XTO Energy Inc. v. NikolaiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Estate of Smith v. SpinelliAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Teal Trading and Development, LP v. Champee Springs Ranches Property Owners Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Hamrick v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.