Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Berry

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1966No. 8264Published

1Opinion of the Court

139 N.W.2d 529 (1966)

Theodore HOFFMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Carl E. BERRY, doing business as Berry Equipment Company of Pierre, South Dakota, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

McGRAW-EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, Third-Party Defendant and Appellant.

No. 8264.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

January 7, 1966.

Rehearing Denied January 21, 1966.

Conmy, Conmy & Feste, Fargo, for appellant.

Burke & Hodny, Grafton, for plaintiff and respondent.

DePuy, Fair & O'Connor, Grafton, for defendant and third-party plaintiff and respondent.

Malcolm D. Young, of Young, Denenberg & Mullery,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Knudson; Concurrence · Erickstad.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lang v. General Motors CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. City of Minot v. Minot Highway Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hoffman v. BerryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Gibbs v. JacobsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Manikowske's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API