Legal Opinion
Cooke v. United States Bureau of Prisons
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided February 27, 2013No. 5:12-CT-3020-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge.
Randle Cooke and Kendrick Douglas (collectively “plaintiffs”) are detainees in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4248. Each has been designated a “sexually dangerous person” under 18 U.S.C. § 4248 and is committed at the Butner Federal Correctional Complex in Butner, North Carolina. Plaintiffs have health conditions that require them to use wheelchairs for mobility and filed this action pursuant to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4151-4156, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq., the…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sai v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Holmes v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Logan v. MatveevskiiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- De Dandrade v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Kendall v. MurrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.