Legal Opinion
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Hinkle
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 18, 1929No. 278PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Appellant is incorporated under the laws of Maine. Its authorized capital stock is $45,000,000. Less than $30,000,000 has been issued and the total value of the corporate property does not exceed that sum. It does an extensive business in meats and foodstuffs throughout the Union and abroad. During 1916 when the capital stock was $20,000,000 the articles of incorporation were duly filed with the proper state officer and the corporation began to carry on closely associated interstate and intrastate business in Washington. Its property therein is ■ now worth $40,000. Gross sales by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Baltic Mining Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Looney, Attorney General of Texas v. Crane CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
3Cited by25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. ShartelSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Southern Pacific Co. v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Western Cartridge Co. v. EmmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- American Insurance v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.