Legal Opinion

United States v. Rich

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 20, 1981No. SPCM 15706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FULTON, Senior Judge:

On the recommendation of the trial counsel in this case, the convening authority accepted appellant’s offer to plead guilty in return for a specified limitation on the sentence to be approved. During the ensuing sentencing proceedings before a military judge, the trial counsel argued for imposition of a particular sentence which exceeded the limits agreed to by the convening authority. His argument for a specific sentence was objected to at the trial and the propriety of his argument has been made an issue on this appeal.1

The Manual for Courts-Martial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. DawsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. OlsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. VillaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. OcchiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  2. United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API