Legal Opinion
Percival v. Luce
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 20, 1940No. 9467PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
As guardian of John Pervical Luce and Dorothy Hume Luce, minors, appellant, W. W. Percival, a citizen of Utah (hereafter called plaintiff), brought this action against appellee, Harold Luce, a citizen of Nevada (hereafter called defendant), in the District Court of the United States for the District of Nevada to recover of defendant $7,600, with interest and costs. Defendant answered. The answer contained no counterclaim. No reply was ordered,1 and none was filed. Thus, with the filing of the answer, the pleadings were closed. Thereafter both parties moved' for judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Hendrick v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schneider v. SchneiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Magrill v. MagrillAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Schwartz v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Gorman v. GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954