Legal Opinion

Richter v. Richter

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2014No. 6931 S-15088PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court granted a divorcee to Shelley and Matthew Richter and equitably divided their marital property. Matthew appeals, challenging the court's jurisdiction and its finding that a loan from Matthew's mother was marital debt. We affirm.

II FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Shelley Richter (now Sailer) and Matthew Richter married in California in January 2010. They separated in October 2011, and Shelley filed for divorcee. At the three-day divorce trial in December 2012, Matthew argued that the superior court lacked jurisdiction over him because he is a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Schanck v. SchanckAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ramsey v. RamseyAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Ruppe v. RuppeAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Dunmore v. DunmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Laura Aubert, Personal Representative of the Estate of David L. Aubert v. Debra J. Wilson, f/k/a Debra J. AubertAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API