Legal Opinion

Blubaugh v. Loomis

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Wood County. Suit by C. B. Blubaugh against George C. Loomis and others. Decree for plaintiff. Defendant Daniel Gould appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

McWhorter, President:

This is a suit to set aside as fraudulent and void as to plaintiff's claim a deed from George C. Loomis and wife to the defendant Daniel Gould, conveying to him certain real estate on Seventh street in the city of Parkersburg, dated October 30, 1894, and to subject the said property to sale for the payment of said claim. In July, 1892, said Loomis made his note to plaintiff Blubaugh endorsed by C. S. Pewsmith and L. N. Tavenner, for five hundred and twenty dollars for borrowed money. The note was not paid, but renewed once or twice, the endorsers waiving protest on it…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Delaplain v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Goshorn's Ex'r v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Wood v. HarmisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hickman's Ex'or v. TroutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crickmer v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dent v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Elkins v. HareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Powers-Taylor Drug Co. v. FaulconerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API