Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Gold Cross Services, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1995No. 940289PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

We granted an interlocutory appeal from a Third District Court ruling upholding the constitutionality of Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-186 and denying defendants’ motion to admit at trial evidence of plaintiffs nonuse of an available safety belt. Gold Cross Services, Inc., dba Gold Cross Ambulance, and William J. Slusher (collectively “Gold Cross”) argue that the statute acts as a rule of evidence and is therefore a legislative intrusion on the rule-making powers reserved to the Supreme Court under the Utah Constitution. In addition, Gold Cross asserts that the statute acts to create…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Society of Separationists, Inc. v. WhiteheadUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lee v. GaufinUtah Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. DrejUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Peterson v. Coca-Cola USAUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API