State v. Riehl
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
The state charged defendant with, among other things, two counts of first-degree robbery. At trial, however, the court instructed the jury that it could consider second-degree robbery a lesser-included offense of the crimes charged. The jury found defendant guilty of two counts of second-degree robbery, and he was sentenced on those convictions. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could consider second-degree robbery a lesser-included offense of the first-degree robbery counts with which he had been charged. We affirm.
We review the trial court’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015