Legal Opinion

State v. Riehl

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 2003No. 99-1952; A108601PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The state charged defendant with, among other things, two counts of first-degree robbery. At trial, however, the court instructed the jury that it could consider second-degree robbery a lesser-included offense of the crimes charged. The jury found defendant guilty of two counts of second-degree robbery, and he was sentenced on those convictions. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could consider second-degree robbery a lesser-included offense of the first-degree robbery counts with which he had been charged. We affirm.

We review the trial court’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API