Legal Opinion
Kaliroy Produce Co. v. Pacific Tomato Growers, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 4, 2010No. CIV 10-160-TUC-CKJPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CINDY K. JORGENSON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Moving Parties’ Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award Under Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 10 in Whole or in Part [Docs. 1 and 2] and Responding Party’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award [Doc. 15]. The parties presented oral argument to the Court on June 7, 2010.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On July 1, 2005, Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. (“PTG”), 1 Kaliroy Produce Co. Inc. (“Kaliroy”), and Agricola LA Primavera S.A. de C.Y. (“ALP”) 2 entered into a Joint Venture Agreement for the purpose of growing, developing,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chavarria v. Ralphs Grocer Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2011