Legal Opinion
Staudinger v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 28, 1988No. 13351PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff, Robert S. Staudinger, Sr., brought this action as administrator of the estate of his son, Robert S. Staudinger, Jr., to recover damages for wrongful death due to the alleged negligence of the defendants, Peter Barrett, Roger Connor, John Basile and the town of Bethel. The plaintiff claimed that the one vehicle accident in which his son died was caused by the high speed pursuit by Bethel Police detectives, Barrett and Connor, of the vehicle his son was driving. The jury returned a general verdict for the defendants, the plaintiff having failed to request that interrogatories be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bound Brook Ass'n v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Wendland v. Ridgefield Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kalleher v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Heath Ex Rel. Holdyn H. v. La Mariana ApartmentsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Macdermid, Inc. v. LeonettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Frank Perrotti & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Gajewski v. PaveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Sheridan v. DesmondConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.