Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rosenblatt v. Sargent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Adams, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBake well, J.

This was a motion to set aside a sale made under execution issued upon a judgment in the above entitled cause, for back taxes. The motion, on hearing, was overruled.

The petition in the original proceeding was filed on September 3, 1879. Eleven defendants were charged as owners, of whom two are married women, whose husbands are made defendants. The petition is in the form usual in such cases, and seems to be sufficient. The property is said to be in the city of St. Louis, and is further described as follows: —

“No. 1. Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, iu city block of Bisley Addition, fronting twenty feet on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wellshear v. KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  2. Brown v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Bragg v. BurleighSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871
  4. Howard v. StevensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Sheehan v. StackhouseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lucas v. PurdySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. McCarter v. NeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  4. Emmons County v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Emmons County v. Lands of First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API