Legal Opinion
La Vallee v. Peer
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
J. Robert Lynch, J.
The defendants move to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction over their persons. The plaintiff cross-moves for leave to file an affidavit of service nunc pro tune.
In attempting to effect service by section 253 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, the plaintiff sent the summons and complaint by certified mail to the defendants at their respective addresses given in the vehicle accident report. The defendant Peer’s letter was returned marked "Moved, left no address” and the defendant Calle’s letter was returned marked "Ad*944dress unknown”. The statute…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Palmer v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Chittenden Lumber Co. v. Silberblatt & Lasker, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Astman v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Stewart v. McIntyreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rifenburg v. Liffiton Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Zimmerman v. ElsnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Greyhound Capital Corp. v. EDP Medical Computer Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Harrington v. Victory Trucking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1988
- Executive Insurance v. Yeshiva Mikdash Melech, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.