Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 48, Afl-Cio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 16, 2003No. 01-71769PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) requests that we enforce its December 15, 2000 order arising from a claim that the respondent International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 48, AFL-CIO (“Local 48” or “union”) violated portions of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “Act”) by forcing its member Patrick Mulcahy to pay Market Recovery Program (“MRP”) funds when he worked on Davis-Bacon Act projects. The Davis-Bacon Act was designed for the benefit of construction workers on government projects, and requires contractors on federally…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peggy Mayes v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sandgathe v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- American Pacific Concrete Pipe Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Building And Construction Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Robert Thomas v. Calportland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Gebhart v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Casino Pauma v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Idaho Building & Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Inland Pacific Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Chu v. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.