Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Cigna Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2001No. 97-05360, 97-05050 and 97-00071 A106117PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Claimant seeks review of the part of a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order affirming denial of his claim due to his noncooperation with the insurer, Cigna. Cigna cross-petitions from the part of the Board’s order denying its motion to dismiss due to claimant’s failure timely to request an expedited noncooperation hearing. We reverse on Cigna’s cross-petition; the Board should have granted the motion to dismiss. We therefore need not and do not address claimant’s petition for review.

ORS 656.262(14) requires injured workers “to cooperate * * * in the investigation of claims for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. DuboseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CIGNA InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lewis v. CIGNA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API