Legal Opinion

State v. Edmunds

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Tillamook: William Galloway, Judge. The defendant, Howard Edmunds, was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the local option law, and from the judgment following such conviction, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice King

1. Defendant was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the local option law, the charges against him being as follows:

“Howard Edmunds is accused by the grand jury in and for Tillamook County, Oregon, by this. indictment, of the crime of selling and giving away intoxicating liquor in violation of the local option liquor law of the State of Oregon, proposed by the people by initiative and enacted by a majority of the votes cast thereon at the general election held in the State of Oregon on the 6th day of June, 1904, committed as follows: That at a general…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State v. CarmodyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. EisenOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Binhoff v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Moe v. AlsopOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. RunyonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. WilburOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. City of Astoria v. MaloneOregon Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API