Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Lumb

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Demarest, J.

In this special proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 petitioner requests an order that respondent Lumb, the St. Lawrence County Family Court Hearing Examiner, comply with section 516-a of the Family Court Act requiring DNA test*1034ing be ordered upon receipt of petitioner’s challenge to the acknowledgment of paternity. Respondent opposes the relief by answer, dated July 2, 1999. The court renders the following decision and order upon review of the parties’ submissions and oral argument at the court’s July 9, 1999 Special Term.

The facts are relatively…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MATTER OF PIRRO v. AngiolilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Montelone v. AntiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Clara C. v. William L.New York City Family Court · 1999
  4. Department of Social Services ex rel. Maureen S. v. John M.New York City Family Court · 1988
  5. McGuire v. SpiresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westchester County Department of Social Services v. Robert W.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re SebastianNew York Surrogate's Court · 2009
  3. Emily R. v. Emilio R.New York City Family Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API