Connors v. Chingren
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pocahontas District Court. — Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for an alleged conspiracy to defraud. There was a trial to a jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant Hughes appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
1 Defendant Chingren was a real-estate agent residing in Honda, and using an office rented from his co-defendant, Hughes. Hughes owned some land in section 8, in Cedar township', Pocahontas county, known as “Sunk Grove.” On the eighth day of August, Hughes conveyed this land, by special warranty deed, to Ohingren’s wife, the expressed consideration being two thousand dollars. The real purchase price, if there was any, was four promissory notes executed by Mrs. Chingren for the sum of one thousand dollars. The character and value of the land are in. dispute ; but the jury was authorized to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baxter v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Starr Bros. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Allen v. KirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- State v. ChingrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Puth v. ZimblemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Peak v. RhynoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Rhodes v. UhlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Greenlee v. EalySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910