Legal Opinion

Tobin v. McKinney

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Fullee, P. J-

The facts essential to a proper understanding of all that is urged on this rehearing are fully stated in Tobin v. McKinney, 14 S. D. 52, 84 N. W. 228, and the only question of law to be determined is whether the statute of limitations began to run on a certain certificate of deposit before payment was demanded. Like any other contract, the character of a certificate of deposit depends upon the intention of the parties, as disclosed by the terms of such instrument; and section 4465 of the Compiled Laws, providing that “a negotiable instrument which does not specify the terms of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tobin v. McKinneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Gruba v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kyselka v. First Nat. Bank of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API