Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kyselka v. First Nat. Bank of Pawhuska

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1950No. 33808Published

1DissentO’Neal, J.

The certificate of deposit, here involved, dated August 4, 1917, certifies that “Frank Kyselka had deposited with the American National Bank of Pawhuska, Oklahoma, Six Hundred and no — Dollars, *457payable to the order of himself on the return of this certificate properly endorsed, twelve months after date with interest at 5 percent per annum. No interest paid after due.”

It is conceded that the American National Bank of Pawhuska changed its name to First National Bank of Paw-huska, and that the first National Bank of Pawhuska assumed all the liabilities of the American National Bank.

As stated in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Payne v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Pardee v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Howell v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Munger v. . Albany City National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API