Legal Opinion
Western Newspaper Union v. Dittemore
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 6, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
This is an action in which the plaintiff seeks payment for services rendered the defendant and for incidental charges in connection therewith. The first of the two counts of its declaration sets out an express contract, alleges full perfprmance, and charges failure by the defendant to pay the agreed compensation. The second count is indebitatus assumpsit for goods sold and delivered and labor performed, according to an account annexed which sets out the same items of charge sought to be recovered under the first count. The answer, in addition to a general denial, sets up that, if the parties…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Mears v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Barlow Manufacturing Co. v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Nigro v. ContiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Montuori v. BailenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Connelly v. Fellsway Motor Mart, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Norfolk County Trust Co. v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.