Legal Opinion

Rodin v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 2000No. 1-99-4486WCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

The claimant, Jack Rodin, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1992)), seeking benefits for injuries he received as a result of an allergic reaction he experienced after eating food at a luncheon he was directed to attend by his employer, P&S Enterprises. Following a hearing, an arbitrator determined that the incident giving rise to the claimant’s injuries occurred in the course of his employment. However, the arbitrator also found that: (1) the claimant suffered from a preexisting condition, (2) his allergic…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Orsini v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. O'Dette v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Brady v. Louis Ruffolo & Sons Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hosteny v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Michael BERNARD v. CARLSON COMPANIES-TGIF and Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  3. McAllister v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Michael BERNARD v. CARLSON COMPANIES-TGIF and Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API