Legal Opinion
Mahan v. Tash
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-1398PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Daisy L. Mahan brings this action against defendant Hymen H. Tash for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, trover and conversion, unjust enrichment, accounting and negligence in connection with defendant’s purchase of 1000 shares of Fuji Photo Film Co. stock on behalf of plaintiff in 1964. Presently before us is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The issues have been extensively briefed. For the reasons that follow we grant defendant’s motion and deny plaintiff’s motion.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul JEFFRIES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American University Park Citizens Ass'n v. BurkaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Haliday v. HalidayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Young v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Watwood v. YambrusicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Purepac Pharmaceutical Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010