Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wolf

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2006No. 2006-0737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Mary Lou Wolf of Loveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0074613, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in May 2002. On June 30, 2005, upon receiving notice that respondent had been convicted of two *412felonies, we suspended her from the practice of law for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A). In re Wolf, 106 Ohio St.3d 1418, 2005-Ohio-3322, 830 N.E.2d 349.

{¶ 2} On August 8, 2005, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged that respondent’s two convictions, both for procuring dangerous prescription drugs by deception in violation of R.C. 2925.22(A), constituted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. ScacchettiOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re J.C.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. RathburnOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API