State v. Rummer

I concur with the majority opinion because it is totally consistent with the law enunciated in many other cases by this Court as well as by the United States Supreme Court.

Because only about one-third of the dissenter’s fifty-page diatribe actually relates to the majority opinion (the other two-thirds of which touches upon everything but the kitchen sink, is full of incredible stereotypes,1 and which of course attributes almost all of society’s ills to working women), I address only part II.

' The dissent fails to recognize, much less discuss, the recent United States Supreme Court cases that…