Wisconsin Livestock Ass'n v. Bowerman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following'opinion was filed April 2, 1929:
Owen, J.
The Bowermans resisted the replevin suit upon two grounds-: their first contention was that the Livestock Association did not have a sufficient title to the cattle to enable it to maintain the action. ' As a matter off fact the Livestock Association did not own -the cattle. ' The legal title to the cattle was- in R. M. Harriman, the president of ’ .the Livestock Association, and they were registered in his name. However, the cattle were delivered to the Bower-mans with his full knowledge and consent pursuant to the-contract between-the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newton v. HoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Rowlands v. VoechtingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Fox v. BoldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- George v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newhouse v. Citizens Security Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Wisconsin Livestock Ass'n v. BowermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Standard Brands Inc. v. Consolidated Badger CooperativeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1950
- Madden Bros. v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931