Legal Opinion

Kihneman v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry Examiners

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1957No. 8703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AYRES, Judge.

In this action plaintiff sought a writ of mandamus to compel the Louisiana State Board of Optometry Examiners to permit him to take an examination for a license, or certificate, authorizing him to practice optometry in the State of Louisiana, and, in the alternative, to issue him a license with a waiver of examination. From a judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands he appealed to the Supreme Court and the appeal was transferred to this court. La., 95 So.2d 492.

This appeal presents four questions for solution: First, whether plaintiff is a graduate of a college of optometry…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Engel v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Broussard v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API