Legal Opinion
Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. v. Schwindt
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1992No. CV-91-0171-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES DUKE CAMERON, Justice.
I. JURISDICTION
Defendants Herbert and Rene Schwindt (Schwindt) petition for review of the court of appeals’ opinion holding that Ariz.Rev. Stat.Ann. (A.R.S.) § 28-324 does not prevent a self-insured car rental agency from seeking indemnification for payments made to a third party for damages caused by the negligence of a person not authorized to drive under the rental agreement. Consolidated Enterprises, Inc. v. Schwindt, 171 Ariz. 452, 831 P.2d 828 (Ct.App.1991). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
II. ISSUES…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Roth v. Old Republic Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Fidelity General Insurance v. Nelsen Steel & Wire Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KoshySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Uyleman v. D.S. RentcoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Allstate Insurance v. ElassalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cordova v. WolfelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.