Longcor v. Atlantic Terra Cotta Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Goodhue county to recover $600. Defendant appeared specially and moved to set aside a pretended service of the summons and complaint. From an order denying the motion, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
On November 1, 1912, plaintiff attempted to commence, in the district court, an action against defendant, a foreign corporation, by service of summons and complaint in this state upon the defendant’s sales agent, one Carpenter. Thereafter, on November 20, defendant made a verified petition stating therein that it appeared only for the purpose of excepting to the service of the summons and complaint, and not generally or for any other purpose, also alleging facts sufficient, prima facie, to require the conclusion that Carpenter was not one upon whom service of a summons could be made so as to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- St. Louis Car Co. v. Stillwater Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Curtis v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Johnson v. HagbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Board of County Commissioners v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Kafka v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Pearson v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- City of Los Angeles v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- First National Bank of Pepin v. CaseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925