Legal Opinion

Hills v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 26, 2000No. 0367994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UPON A REHEARING

ANNUNZIATA, Judge.

David Lee Hills appeals from his conviction of rape. He contends: 1) the trial court erred in allowing an expert witness’ testimony based upon statistical data relating to DNA evidence; 2) that DNA evidence offered by the Commonwealth should not have been admitted because he was not given proper notice of the Commonwealth’s intent to proffer this evidence; 3) the trial court erred in denying his motions to strike the Commonwealth’s evidence at the close of the trial, and to set aside the conviction, because the evidence at trial was insufficient to support…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. LeVasseur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  3. Traverso v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  4. Evans-Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  5. Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  2. Jonathan Nathaniel Ramsey v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
  3. Hills v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownRichmond County Circuit Court · 2001
  5. Hills v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API