Hills v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
SENIOR JUSTICE STEPHENSON
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In Fishback v. Commonwealth, 260 Va. 104, 115, 532 S.E.2d 629, 634 (2000), we established a new rule requiring trial courts to instruct juries on the abolition of parole for non-capital felony *809offenses committed on and after January 1, 1995. In this appeal, we determine (1) whether the appropriate remedy for a Fishback error is a remand of the case for a new sentencing hearing only, and (2) whether Fishback requires a trial court to permit voir dire examination of prospective jurors concerning their knowledge of parole ineligibility.
I
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Yarbrough v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Fishback v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Lilly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winston v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Young v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Jonathan Nathaniel Ramsey v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Michael Ryan Bruton v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.