Legal Opinion

Hills v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 2, 2001No. Record 010193PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENIOR JUSTICE STEPHENSON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In Fishback v. Commonwealth, 260 Va. 104, 115, 532 S.E.2d 629, 634 (2000), we established a new rule requiring trial courts to instruct juries on the abolition of parole for non-capital felony *809offenses committed on and after January 1, 1995. In this appeal, we determine (1) whether the appropriate remedy for a Fishback error is a remand of the case for a new sentencing hearing only, and (2) whether Fishback requires a trial court to permit voir dire examination of prospective jurors concerning their knowledge of parole ineligibility.

I

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Yarbrough v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  4. Fishback v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Lilly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winston v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  3. Young v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Jonathan Nathaniel Ramsey v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
  5. Michael Ryan Bruton v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API