Legal Opinion

Riverview Estates, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas C. Chimera, J.

Motion by plaintiffs for an order striking out defendant’s answer and directing entry of judgment. Defendant cross-moves for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.

The complaint sets forth five separate causes of action in behalf of five separate plaintiffs, all of whom, with the exception of plaintiff Dench, have paid under protest certain bills of assessment levied against their respective properties by defendant. Plaintiff Dench has continuously refused to pay the bill applicable to his property. It seeks judgment in favor of those paying under protest, for the amountsvpaid with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black v. General Wiper Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. In re the City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for the Same Purpose in Fee to the LandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Bureau of Assessors of New York City Finance AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Riverview Estates, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API