Legal Opinion
Jim Arnold Corp. v. Bishop
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided August 29, 1996No. 09-93-113CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Chief Justice.
Jim Arnold Corporation (JACOR), appellant herein, brought-suit against appellees, George M. Bishop, George M. Bishop, P.C. (collectively “Bishop”), Harrison Vickers (“Vickers”), Matthews and Associates, and Guy E. Matthews (collectively “Matthews”), on various claims, including, but not limited to, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, legal malpractice, Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) violations, and tortious interference with business relationships. A declaratory judgment cause of action was brought against Vickers alone.
This case was tried in the 260th Judicial…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. ReynaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Montgomery County v. Fuqua, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- Hendricks v. Thornton, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998
- Cook v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Brandon Moon v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Reed v. Carecentric National, LLC (In Re Soporex, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.