Legal Opinion
Brown v. Potomac Electric Power Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1131Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GAMAL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1131 (TJK) POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff Gamal Brown’s Motion to Remand or Amend his Complaint, ECF No. 7, and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5. For the reasons set forth below, Brown’s motion is (1) denied as to remand, and (2) denied without prejudice as to the amendment of his complaint. The Court will order Brown to file a motion to amend that complies with the Local Rules within 30 days. As a result,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.