Legal Opinion

Bah v. United States

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 26, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00166Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 26, 2024 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk BROWNSVILLE DIVISION MUHAMED PATHE BAH, § Movant, § § v. § Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-166 § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § Respondent. § MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Muhamed Pathe Bah moves under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, arguing in three claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Dkt. Nos. 1, 3 (collectively, Bah’s “Motion”). The United States of America (“the Government”) responded and moved for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API